(PC) Harper v. Path
Opinion
JOHNATHAN SETH HARPER, No. 1:21-cv-0558 JLT HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO WELL PATH, et al., CLOSE THE CASE Defendants. (Doc. 38) Johnathan Seth Harper initiated this action seeking to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil rights while incarcerated at Kings County Jail Hanford. (Doc. 1.) The magistrate judge determined that Plaintiff has since failed to prosecute the action and failed to comply with the Court’s orders. (Doc. 38.) Thus, the magistrate judge recommended the action be dismissed without prejudice. (Id. at 5.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 38 at 5.) The Court advised him that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of certain rights on appeal.” (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time to do so has passed. According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1. The Findings and Recommendation, filed on April 11, 2024 (Doc. 38) is ADOPTED in full. 2. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. | Dated: _ May 8, 2024 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Harper v. Path ((PC) Harper v. Path) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.