(PC) Hand v. Management and Training Corporation

District Court, E.D. California·Decided May 5, 2021·No. 1:20-cv-00819·Unknown

Opinion

2 3

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 JEHU HAND, 1:20-cv-00819-GSA (PC)

9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS AS 10 vs. PREMATURE (ECF No. 13.) 11 MANAGEMENT AND TRAINING CORPORATION, et al., 12 Defendants. 13

15 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 Jehu Hand (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 19 (1971). On June 12, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) 20 On January 7, 2021, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint as a matter of course. (ECF 21 No. 2.) 22 On May 3, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for the court to issue a summons to initiate 23 service of process upon the defendant in this case. (ECF No. 13.) 24 II. SCREENING AND SERVICE OF PROCESS 25 The court is required by law to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 26 against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity, such as the instant 27 action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a 28 complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or 1 malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary 2 relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). 3 With respect to service, the court will, sua sponte, initiate service of the First Amended 4 Complaint only after the court has screened the First Amended Complaint and determined that it 5 contains cognizable claims for relief against the named defendant. 6 Here, Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint awaits the court’s screening, and therefore it 7 is not time for service in this case. Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion shall be denied as premature. 8 III. CONCLUSION 9 Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for issuance 10 of a summons, filed on May 3, 2021, is DENIED as premature. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12

13 Dated: May 5, 2021 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Hand v. Management and Training Corporation, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(PC) Hand v. Management and Training Corporation ((PC) Hand v. Management and Training Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related