(PC) Brown v. Chothia

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 9, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-00352·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUGENE C. BROWN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00352-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR v. DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT C. PATILLO WITH PREJUDICE C. CHOTHIA, et al., Defendants. (ECF No. 66) Plaintiff Eugene C. Brown and Defendants C. Chothia, A. Shaw, K. Kempe, C. Jukes, M. Londono, M. Gilmore, J. Walker, M. Crutchfield, C. Patillo, K.Z. Allen, and D. Artis have filed a stipulation to dismiss all claims against Defendant C. Patillo with prejudice. (ECF No. 66.) Pursuant to the stipulation, the case against Defendant C. Patillo has ended and the case is dismissed with prejudice only as to Defendant C. Patillo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate only Defendant C. Patillo on the docket. IS SO ORDERED. 26] Dated: _ December 9, 2020 [sl ey UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Brown v. Chothia, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(PC) Brown v. Chothia ((PC) Brown v. Chothia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)