(PC) Bowell v. Montoya

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 10, 2020·No. 1:17-cv-00605·Unknown

Opinion

JAMES BOWELL, 1:17-cv-00605-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL vs. (ECF No. 69.)

F. MONTOYA, et al.,

Defendants.

On June 29, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the Court cannot require an attorney to represent Plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). However, in certain exceptional circumstances the Court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to section 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525. Without a reasonable method of securing and compensating counsel, the court will seek volunteer counsel only in the most serious and exceptional cases. In determining whether “exceptional circumstances exist, the district court must evaluate both the likelihood of success of the merits [and] the ability of the [plaintiff] to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). Plaintiff argues that he needs appointed counsel “because of the Worldwide Covid-19 pandemic obstructing his opportunities to review critical material evidence.” (ECF No. 1.) These conditions do not make Plaintiff’s case exceptional under the law. At this stage of the proceedings it is too early to determine whether Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits. The court finds that Plaintiff can adequately articulate his claim. Plaintiff’s claims, for retaliation, due process, and failure to protect Plaintiff, are not complex. Therefore, Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel shall be denied, without prejudice to renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings. Therefore, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel be DENIED, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 10, 2020 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Bowell v. Montoya, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(PC) Bowell v. Montoya ((PC) Bowell v. Montoya) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related