Pazmino v. Southeast Bank, N.A.
561 So. 2d 464, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3611, 1990 WL 67335
Opinion
Affirmed. Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985); Junction Bit & Tool Co. v. Village Apartments, Inc., 262 So.2d 659 (Fla.1972); De Marco v. Cayman Overseas Reinsurance Ass’n, Ltd., 460 So.2d 547 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Lisbon Holding & Inv. Co. v. Village Apartments, Inc., 237 So.2d 197 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. dismissed, 241 So.2d 859 (Fla.1970).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pazmino v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 561 So. 2d 464, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3611, 1990 WL 67335 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
561 So. 2d 464 (Pazmino v. Southeast Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz
471 U.S. 462 (Supreme Court, 1985)
DeMarco v. CAYMAN OVERSEAS REINSURANCE
460 So. 2d 547 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Lisbon Holding & Investment Co. v. Village Apartments, Inc.
237 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)