Paz Gomez v. Reyes Gonzalez

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided February 28, 2025·No. 3:24-cv-05645·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3

4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT AT SEATTLE 7 RUBEN PAZ GOMEZ, CASE NO. C24-5645-KKE 8

Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S 9 v. REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

10 YANISLEIDY REYES GONZALEZ,

11 Respondent.

12 At the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing held on the Petition for Return of Child Under 13 Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (Dkt. No. 12), the Court granted 14 the parties’ request to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in lieu of closing 15 arguments. Dkt. No. 61. The Court ordered the parties to file those submissions no later than 16 February 27, 2025. Id. At 11:58 p.m. on that date, Petitioner’s counsel filed a motion for 17 extension, explaining that her workload had prevented her from meeting this deadline and 18 requesting an extension of unspecified length. Dkt. No. 68. 19 Petitioner’s motion does not comply with the Local Rules of the Western District of 20 Washington. Specifically, Local Civil Rule 7(j) requires that Petitioner meet and confer with 21 Respondent and attempt to obtain a stipulated extension, which apparently Petitioner’s counsel did 22 not endeavor to do. Petitioner’s counsel also failed to identify any “emergency” necessitating an 23 24 1 extension, other than a general reference to her workload. Finally, Petitioner’s counsel does not 2 explain how long of an extension she is seeking. 3 Given that the Court must act expeditiously in these proceedings, and that Petitioner’s

4 counsel’s failed to show that the deadline could not be met despite diligence, the Court will 5 GRANT Petitioner’s motion (Dkt. No. 68) but provide only a short continuance of the briefing 6 deadline. See, e.g., Golan v. Saada, 596 U.S. 666, 681–82 (2022) (discussing the importance of 7 expeditious and timely action to resolve return petitions). Petitioner’s proposed findings of fact 8 and conclusions of law must be submitted no later than March 3, 2025, and no further extensions 9 should be expected. 10 Dated this 28th day of February, 2025. 11 A 12 Kymberly K. Evanson 13 United States District Judge

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paz Gomez v. Reyes Gonzalez, (W.D. Wash. 2025).

Paz Gomez v. Reyes Gonzalez (Paz Gomez v. Reyes Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.