Paz Gomez v. Reyes Gonzalez

W.D. Washington

Paz Gomez v. Reyes Gonzalez

DecidedSeptember 4, 2024

Docket3:24-cv-05645

StatusUnknown

This text of Paz Gomez v. Reyes Gonzalez (Paz Gomez v. Reyes Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paz Gomez v. Reyes Gonzalez, (W.D. Wash. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3

4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 RUBEN PAZ GOMEZ, CASE NO. C24-5645-KKE 8

Plaintiff, ORDER ON CASE STATUS 9 v.

10 YANISLEIDY REYES GONZALEZ,

11 Defendant.

12 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Petition for Return of Child Under 13 Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“Convention”). Dkt. No. 1. 14 Plaintiff filed the petition on August 6, 2024, but failed to redact the child’s first name in 15 the “Verification of Petition” section. Dkt. No. 1 at 17. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 5.2(a) and Local Rule 5.2, the Court placed the petition under seal and instructed the Plaintiff to 17 file a redacted version of the document. Plaintiff filed a redacted petition, but again failed to redact 18 the child’s name. Dkt. No. 7 at 17. Again, the Court placed the petition under seal and instructed 19 Plaintiff to file a correctly redacted copy. Plaintiff failed to file a redacted petition. 20 Under the Convention and the International Child Abductions Remedies Act, 22 U.S.C. § 21 9001 et seq., the Court must “‘use the most expeditious procedures available’ to decide petitions 22 arising under the Convention, with decisions generally expected within six weeks from the date of 23 filing.” Colchester v. Lazaro, 16 F.4th 712, 717 (9th Cir. 2021) (citing Hague Convention, Oct. 24 1 25, 1980, arts. 2, 11, 19 I.L.M. at 1501–02). The Court must ensure this case is handled 2 expeditiously and thus ORDERS the following: 3 1. Plaintiff must file a redacted petition, properly redacting the child’s name, no later

4 than September 6, 2024. Dkt. No. 7 at 17, see Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 5 5.2(a)(2). 6 2. Plaintiff must file proof of service on Defendant, or an explanation of efforts to 7 serve Defendant, by September 11, 2024. 8 Dated this 4th day of September, 2024. 9 A 10 Kymberly K. Evanson 11 United States District Judge

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3

4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 RUBEN PAZ GOMEZ, CASE NO. C24-5645-KKE 8

Plaintiff, ORDER ON CASE STATUS 9 v.

10 YANISLEIDY REYES GONZALEZ,

11 Defendant.

12 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Petition for Return of Child Under 13 Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“Convention”). Dkt. No. 1. 14 Plaintiff filed the petition on August 6, 2024, but failed to redact the child’s first name in 15 the “Verification of Petition” section. Dkt. No. 1 at 17. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 5.2(a) and Local Rule 5.2, the Court placed the petition under seal and instructed the Plaintiff to 17 file a redacted version of the document. Plaintiff filed a redacted petition, but again failed to redact 18 the child’s name. Dkt. No. 7 at 17. Again, the Court placed the petition under seal and instructed 19 Plaintiff to file a correctly redacted copy. Plaintiff failed to file a redacted petition. 20 Under the Convention and the International Child Abductions Remedies Act, 22 U.S.C. § 21 9001 et seq., the Court must “‘use the most expeditious procedures available’ to decide petitions 22 arising under the Convention, with decisions generally expected within six weeks from the date of 23 filing.” Colchester v. Lazaro, 16 F.4th 712, 717 (9th Cir. 2021) (citing Hague Convention, Oct. 24 1 25, 1980, arts. 2, 11, 19 I.L.M. at 1501–02). The Court must ensure this case is handled 2 expeditiously and thus ORDERS the following: 3 1. Plaintiff must file a redacted petition, properly redacting the child’s name, no later

4 than September 6, 2024. Dkt. No. 7 at 17, see Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 5 5.2(a)(2). 6 2. Plaintiff must file proof of service on Defendant, or an explanation of efforts to 7 serve Defendant, by September 11, 2024. 8 Dated this 4th day of September, 2024. 9 A 10 Kymberly K. Evanson 11 United States District Judge

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Paz Gomez v. Reyes Gonzalez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paz-gomez-v-reyes-gonzalez-wawd-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack