Payton v. Ford
This text of 68 S.E. 300 (Payton v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The allegations of the petition and the evidence submitted in support of the same authorized the grant of an interlocutory injunction against the plaintiff in error.
2. Upon the hearing of an application for an interlocutory injunction, if the prayer be granted, it operates to grant the injunction until the final hearing. While it is improper to grant a permanent injunction at such a hearing, the error in granting such an injunction will not require a [588]*588reversal, but only a direction that the order be so modified as to render the injunction granted interlocutory instead of permanent. Bleyer v. Blum & Co., 70 Ga. 558; Mayor etc. of Brunswick v. Williams, 131 Ga. 429 (62 S. E. 230); Unity Cotton Mills v. Dunson, 131 Ga. 258 (62 S. E. 179).
Judgment affirmed, with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 S.E. 300, 134 Ga. 587, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payton-v-ford-ga-1910.