Mayor of Brunswick v. Williams
This text of 62 S.E. 230 (Mayor of Brunswick v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Under the allegations of the petition, it does not appear that it was brought to enjoin or prevent the institution of prosecutions for the violation of any existing penal municipal ordinance, or to inquire into the validity or reasonableness of any existing ordinance making criminal the acts for the doing of which prosecutions were threatened;_ but on the contrary the petition showed that the defendant municipality had expressly given him permission, legally granted by proper corporate action, to put up the building he was engaged in erecting in exact accordance with such permission, and that there was no existing ordinance prohibiting the erection of such a building.
2. There was ample evidence to authorize the granting of an order restraining defendants as prayed for, until final trial; but as the judge, probably inadvertently, granted a permanent injunction on an interlocutory hearing, it is ordered that the judgment be affirmed, with direction that it be so amended as to make the injunction merely interlocutory.
Judgment affirmed, ^mth direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 S.E. 230, 131 Ga. 429, 1908 Ga. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mayor-of-brunswick-v-williams-ga-1908.