Payne v. State

65 So. 262, 10 Ala. App. 85, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 140
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 14, 1914·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PELHAM, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder in the second degree, and convicted of an assault with a weapon. A number of written charges, marked as requested by the defendant and refused by the court, are set out in the record, but as the record contains no [86] bill of exceptions they are not presented in such a way as authorizes their review.' — Peters v. Nolen, 3 Ala. App. 641, 57 South. 398.

The time for presenting and having signed a bill of exceptions has expired, and we discover no error in the proceedings properly shown by the record. They appear to be regular, and the judgment appealed from is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Payne v. State, 65 So. 262, 10 Ala. App. 85, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 140 (Ala. Ct. App. 1914).

65 So. 262 (Payne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griggs v. State
84 So. 869 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1920)
Carden v. State
85 So. 36 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1920)
Jones v. State
84 So. 627 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1919)
Clark v. State
72 So. 291 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Weyms v. State
69 So. 310 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)