Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Payne v. State

Payne v. State

65 So. 262, 10 Ala. App. 85, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 140
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 14, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 65 So. 262 (Payne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Payne v. State, 65 So. 262, 10 Ala. App. 85, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 140 (Ala. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

PELHAM, J.

The defendant was indicted for murder in the second degree, and convicted of an assault with a weapon. A number of written charges, marked as requested by the defendant and refused by the court, are set out in the record, but as the record contains no [86]*86bill of exceptions they are not presented in such a way as authorizes their review.' — Peters v. Nolen, 3 Ala. App. 641, 57 South. 398.

The time for presenting and having signed a bill of exceptions has expired, and we discover no error in the proceedings properly shown by the record. They appear to be regular, and the judgment appealed from is ordered affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griggs v. State
84 So. 869 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1920)
Carden v. State
85 So. 36 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1920)
Jones v. State
84 So. 627 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1919)
Clark v. State
72 So. 291 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Weyms v. State
69 So. 310 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 So. 262, 10 Ala. App. 85, 1914 Ala. App. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-state-alactapp-1914.