Griggs v. State

84 So. 869, 17 Ala. App. 344, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 35
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 3, 1920
Docket5 Div. 300.
StatusPublished

This text of 84 So. 869 (Griggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griggs v. State, 84 So. 869, 17 Ala. App. 344, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 35 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

MERRITT, J.

The defendant was indicted and convicted in the lower court, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of three years.

[1] There is no bill of exceptions in this case, and more than three months has expired since the sentence was announced. The testimony is copied into the record, but not in the form of- a bill "of exception, and, of course, cannot be considered as a bill of exceptions. The in'dictment and judgment appear to be regular, and there is no error in the record.

[2] Several written charges, which were refused to appellant, are incorporated into-the record; but, in the absence of a bill of exceptions, they are not presented in such a way as to authorize the court to review them. Payne v. State, 10 Ala. App. 85, 65 South. 262.

The case will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Payne v. State
65 So. 262 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 So. 869, 17 Ala. App. 344, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griggs-v-state-alactapp-1920.