Pawnee Tribe of Indians v. United States

56 Ct. Cl. 1, 1920 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 9, 1920 WL 644
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedDecember 6, 1920
DocketNo. 17324
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 56 Ct. Cl. 1 (Pawnee Tribe of Indians v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pawnee Tribe of Indians v. United States, 56 Ct. Cl. 1, 1920 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 9, 1920 WL 644 (cc 1920).

Opinion

Findings of fact under Seo. 161, Judicial Code. — -Torts are neither legal nor equitable claims within the meaning of section 151, Judicial Code.

Same. — An agreement to protect Indians in the possession of their homes is not a promise to pay the tribe for loss of lives or property of individual Indians, and a claim for losses for failure to protect is neither legal nor equitable within the purview of Sec. 151, Judicial Code.

Same; jurisdiction. — The general jurisdiction of the Court of Claims does not extend to claims growing out of treaties with the Indians, but the court has jurisdiction to make findings of fact concerning such claims under a proper reference by Congress.

The Reporter's statement of the case:

The following are the statement, findings of fact and conclusion announced by the court:

STATEMENT.

This is a claim consisting of a number of items sets forth in the following statement:

On February 21, 1911, Senate bill No. 10830 of the Sixty-first Congress was referred to this court by resolution of the [2]*2United States Senate, under provisions of law, a of fact and report thereon. The section of the bill which relates to this case reads as follows:

“ That the sum of three hundred thousand dollars is hereby appropriated to pay all claims, of whatsoever nature, which the Pawnee Tribe of Indians may have or claim to have against the United States for the amount due or claimed to be due said tribe from the United States under any treaties or laws of Congress, or for the misappropriation of any funds of the said tribe, or for the failure of the United States to pay the tribe any money due.”

The claimant thereafter appeared in this court and filed a petition on the 3d day of October, 1913, in which it is alleged in substance that the Pawnee Tribe of Indians had treaty relations with the United States, and was then and still is under the control and guardianship of the United States; that the plaintiff tribe resides in the State of Oklahoma, and its members occupy lands in severalty; that it formerly held in common certain lands (a part of which they now hold in severalty) acquired from the Cherokee and Creek Tribes; that prior to this the plaintiff held by treaty with the United States certain land in the State of Nebraska; that a treaty was concluded between the United States and the Pawnee Tribe of Indians, dated October 9, 1833 (7 Stat., 418), under the provisions of which the petition sets forth several items of claim, as follows:

(1) Por the balance of annuities under Article III of the treaty, $311.87, alleged to be still due said tribe.

(2) For the sum of $28,641.55, appropriated for the purchase of agricultural implements under Article IV, and diverted to other purposes.

The facts as to these items are set out in Finding I.

[3]*3That on September 24, 1857, the plaintiff entered into a treaty with the United States (11 Stat., 729) under which the following items of the claim are set forth in the petition:

(a) Claim for $79,496.97, alleged to have been appropriated under Article IV for the employment of farmers, blacksmiths, apprentices, millers, and engineers, and the erection of a steam mill, and not so expended. The facts as to this item are contained in Finding III.

(Z>) Claim for $29,960, alleged to have been appropriated under Article IV for the employment of farmers, blacksmiths, apprentices, millers, and engineers, and the erection of a steam mill, and not so expended. The facts as to this item are contained in Finding III.

(o) Claim for $53,750 as damages alleged for failure to protect the lives of members of the plaintiff tribe and their property, as required by Article- IV of said treaty. The facts as to this item are contained in Finding IV.

(d) Claim for $8,000 as damages alleged for frauds perpetrated on the plaintiff by their agent in furnishing supplies to the tribe. The facts as to this item are set out in Finding V.

(e) Claim for $36,000 as the value of the Pawnee school, farm, and agency buildings on the reservation of tribe in Nebraska, reserved from sale when the said reservation was sold. The facts as to this item are set out in Finding VI.

(/) Claim for $315,781.49 for surplus lands of the reservation in Oklahoma after allotment in severalty, ceded to the United States by the Jerome agreement, and interest at 5 per centum to July 1, 1920. The facts as to this item are set out in Finding VII.

This case having been heard by the Court of Claims, the court, upon the evidence, makes the following

FINDINGS OE FACT.

By Article III, to pay to the said bands annually for 12 years the sum of $4,600 in goods. Congress duly appropriated therefor the total sum of $55,200. Of this amount $54,888.13 was expended as provided by the treaty. The balance, $311.87, was credited to the tribe on overpayments of annuities under the subsequent treaty of September 24, 1857.

By Article IY, to pay to each of said bands $500 (in agricultural implements) annually for five years (a total of $10,000), “to be continued longer if the President thinks proper.” In fulfillment of this obligation Congress appropriated annually for five years the stipulated sum, in all, $10,000; and, on the recommendation of the President, appropriated up to and including the year 1858 an additional $32,000. Out of the total amount of these appropriations the sum of $13,358.45 was expended for the benefit of the plaintiff tribe as stipulated in the treaty, being $3,358.45 in excess of the actual obligation of the United States under said treaty. Acting under authority of the act of Congress of August 26, 1842 (5 Stats., 533), the President directed the transfer of $8,902, of the total amount appropriated, to supply deficiencies in other items in the Indian Office; and under authority of the act of Congress of March 3, 1843 (id., 613), directed the transfer of $3,176.27 to adjust accounts of disbursing officers. The sum of $14,846.59 was covered into the surplus fund; and the balance of the total appropriation, to wit, $1,716.69, was used under the treaty of September 24, 1857, for the purchase of agricultural implements for said Indians.

By Article Y, to allow $1,000 a year for 10 years “for schools to be established for the benefit of said four bands at the discretion of the President.” Commencing with the year 1834 Congress appropriated annually for 10 years the stipulated sum, and in 1844 appropriated an additional $500, making a total appropriation of $10,500. The President directed no expenditures out of the' sums appropriated until the year 1843, and from that date until the year 1853 a total of [5]*5$4,689.92 was expended upon the education of the Pawnee Tribe. Out of the balance remaining the President directed the transfer of $3,000 under the act of March 3, 1843 (5 Stats., 613); and the balance, $2,810.18, was covered into the surplus fund.

By Article VI, to furnish two blacksmiths and two strikers with shops, tools, and iron for 10 years at an expense not exceeding $2,000 annually. Congress appropriated the maximum sum yearly for 10 years, and in 1844 appropriated an additional $1,000, making a total appropriation of $21,000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nez Perce Tribe of Indians v. United States
176 Ct. Cl. 815 (Court of Claims, 1966)
Pawnee Indian Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
109 F. Supp. 860 (Court of Claims, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 Ct. Cl. 1, 1920 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 9, 1920 WL 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pawnee-tribe-of-indians-v-united-states-cc-1920.