Pavlova v. Global Liberty Ins.
This text of 72 Misc. 3d 136(A) (Pavlova v. Global Liberty Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pavlova v Global Liberty Ins. (2021 NY Slip Op 50726(U)) [*1]
| Pavlova v Global Liberty Ins. |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 50726(U) [72 Misc 3d 136(A)] |
| Decided on July 23, 2021 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on July 23, 2021
PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., DAVID ELLIOT, DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ
2019-1667 K C
against
Global Liberty Insurance, Appellant.
Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. (Jason Tenenbaum and Shaaker Bhuiyan of counsel), for appellant. The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell and Karina Barska of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Cenceria P. Edwards, J.), entered March 27, 2019. The judgment, entered upon a decision of that court dated February 21, 2019, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,498.09.
ORDERED that, on the court's own motion, the notice of appeal from the decision dated February 21, 2019 is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment entered March 27, 2019 (see CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from a judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarding plaintiff the principal sum of $1,498.09. At the outset of the trial, the parties stipulated that the sole issue for trial would be the application of the workers' compensation fee schedule, and that the instant action would be consolidated for trial with two other actions involving the same provider and insurer. Following the trial, the Civil Court found in favor of plaintiff.
For the reasons stated in Ksenia Pavlova, D.O., as Assignee of David Wright v Global Liberty Ins. (— Misc 3d &mdash, 2021 NY Slip Op — [appeal No. 2019-1634 K C], decided herewith), the judgment is affirmed.
ALIOTTA, P.J., and GOLIA, J., concur.
ELLIOT, J., taking no part.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: July 23, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 Misc. 3d 136(A), 2021 NY Slip Op 50726(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pavlova-v-global-liberty-ins-nyappterm-2021.