Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

186 A.D.2d 792, 589 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12219

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 A.D.2d 792 (Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 186 A.D.2d 792, 589 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12219 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for acting in bad faith in refusing to settle an insurance claim, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), entered December 5, 1989, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed, as the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; see, Pavia v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 183 AD2d 189 [decided herewith]). Thompson, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for acting in bad faith in refusing to settle an insurance claim, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), entered December 5, 1989, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed, as the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; see, Pavia v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 183 AD2d 189 [decided herewith]). Thompson, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 A.D.2d 792, 589 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pavia-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack