Pauline v. Fitzpatrick
This text of 318 P.2d 84 (Pauline v. Fitzpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by respondents to dismiss appeal on ground of failure of appellants to file opening brief. Motion by appellants to stay appeal.
A complete history of the proceedings in this matter is set forth in Estate of Doran, No. 17513, this day decided (see Estate of Doran, ante, p. 230 [316 P.2d 83].)
For the reasons set forth in said decision the motion to stay appeal is denied and the motion to dismiss is granted.
Peters, P. J., and Wood (Fred B.), J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
318 P.2d 84, 154 Cal. App. 2d 872, 1957 Cal. App. LEXIS 1715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pauline-v-fitzpatrick-calctapp-1957.