Pauline v. Fitzpatrick

318 P.2d 84, 154 Cal. App. 2d 872, 1957 Cal. App. LEXIS 1715
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 7, 1957
DocketCiv. No. 17593
StatusPublished
Cited by83 cases

This text of 318 P.2d 84 (Pauline v. Fitzpatrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pauline v. Fitzpatrick, 318 P.2d 84, 154 Cal. App. 2d 872, 1957 Cal. App. LEXIS 1715 (Cal. Ct. App. 1957).

Opinion

BRAY, J.

Motion by respondents to dismiss appeal on ground of failure of appellants to file opening brief. Motion by appellants to stay appeal.

A complete history of the proceedings in this matter is set forth in Estate of Doran, No. 17513, this day decided (see Estate of Doran, ante, p. 230 [316 P.2d 83].)

For the reasons set forth in said decision the motion to stay appeal is denied and the motion to dismiss is granted.

Peters, P. J., and Wood (Fred B.), J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ace American Insurance Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.
2 Cal. App. 5th 159 (California Court of Appeal, 2016)
Farmers Insurance v. American Family Mutual Insurance
259 P.3d 991 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2011)
Certain Underwriters v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
230 P.3d 103 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)
Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. USF Insurance
164 Wash. 2d 411 (Washington Supreme Court, 2008)
Mutual of Enumclaw Ins. Co. v. USF Ins. Co.
191 P.3d 866 (Washington Supreme Court, 2008)
Cascade Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.
135 P.3d 450 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2006)
Travelers Cas. and Sur. v. Century Sur.
13 Cal. Rptr. 3d 526 (California Court of Appeal, 2004)
Housing Group v. Gerling America Ins. Co., Inc.
107 F. Supp. 2d 1185 (N.D. California, 2000)
Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp v. Yosemite Ins. Co.
58 Cal. App. 4th 389 (California Court of Appeal, 1997)
Century Indemnity Co. v. Superior Court
50 Cal. App. 4th 1115 (California Court of Appeal, 1996)
Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Continental Insurance
450 Mich. 429 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1995)
Hoffmaster v. Harleysville Insurance
657 A.2d 1274 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
CSE Ins. Group v. Northbrook Property & Cas. Co.
23 Cal. App. 4th 1839 (California Court of Appeal, 1994)
Shell Oil Co. v. Winterthur Swiss Insurance
12 Cal. App. 4th 715 (California Court of Appeal, 1993)
Fortman v. Safeco Insurance
221 Cal. App. 3d 1394 (California Court of Appeal, 1990)
United Pacific Insurance v. Hanover Insurance
217 Cal. App. 3d 925 (California Court of Appeal, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
318 P.2d 84, 154 Cal. App. 2d 872, 1957 Cal. App. LEXIS 1715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pauline-v-fitzpatrick-calctapp-1957.