Paula Sinclair v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 30, 2018·No. 01-18-00479-CR·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued August 30, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (Tex. Crim. App. 1961); Saliba v. State, 45 S.W.3d 329, 329 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2001, no pet.). Here, the trial court, on March 9, 2018, dismissed the case upon appellant’s conviction in another case, trial court cause number 17- DCR-079457.1 Accordingly, there is no judgment of conviction in the underlying case, only an order of dismissal. Absent a judgment of conviction, we do not have jurisdiction to consider appellant’s appeal. See Workman, 343 S.W.2d at 447; Skillern v. State, 355 S.W.3d 262, 266–67 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, pet. ref’d); see, e.g., Meeks v. State, Nos. 14-14-00497-CR, 14-14-00581-CR, 2014 WL 3843821, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 5, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (determining court was without jurisdiction when appellant filed notice of appeal of order dismissing case because appellant had been convicted in another case); Ballard v. State, Nos. 01-08-00947-CR, 01-08- 00948-CR, 2009 WL 3248197, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 8, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (explaining court had no jurisdiction because “cause is finally disposed of by a judgment of dismissal and there is no judgment of conviction”).

1 The clerk’s record filed in this Court does not include a motion for new trial filed in the underlying trial court proceeding but does include the trial court’s “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law,” stating that the trial court “rules to deny [appellant’s] motion for new trial.” However, these findings and conclusions were filed in trial court “Cause Numbers:

17-DCR-079457, 17-DCR-079458, 17-DCR-079459, and 17-DCR-079460,” not cause number 17-DCR-076949, the case underlying this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Lloyd. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paula Sinclair v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Paula Sinclair v. State (Paula Sinclair v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Workman v. State
343 S.W.2d 446 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
Saliba v. State
45 S.W.3d 329 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Skillern v. State
355 S.W.3d 262 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)