Paul v. State

804 So. 2d 612, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 429, 2002 WL 80909

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paul v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 830 So. 2d 953 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 23, 2002·No. No. 3D01-1880·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s revocation of probation and sentence.

Appellant argues, and the state concedes, that the written order of revocation does not conform with the oral pronouncements of the trial court. We agree.

The trial court concluded that Appellant did not violate condition seven by using alcohol to excess. It further found that Appellant did not violate the law when he was taken to the County jail. Accordingly, we remand this case with directions to strike any indications to the contrary from the written order.

Affirmed and remanded for correction of the final order revoking probation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s revocation of probation and sentence.

Appellant argues, and the state concedes, that the written order of revocation does not conform with the oral pronouncements of the trial court. We agree.

Affirmed and remanded for correction of the final order revoking probation.

Paul v. State, 804 So. 2d 612, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 429, 2002 WL 80909 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

804 So. 2d 612 (Paul v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.