Paul v. Paul

865 So. 2d 1277, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 158, 2004 WL 212452
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 5, 2004
DocketNo. SC02-681
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 865 So. 2d 1277 (Paul v. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul v. Paul, 865 So. 2d 1277, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 158, 2004 WL 212452 (Fla. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Paul v. Paul, 807 So.2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), a decision which the district court of appeal certified to be in direct conflict with the decision of another district court pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we have now determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pernas v. Poggi
983 So. 2d 1195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Dileo v. Dileo
939 So. 2d 181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
865 So. 2d 1277, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 158, 2004 WL 212452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-v-paul-fla-2004.