Paul v. Paul

Supreme Court of Florida

Paul v. Paul

865 So. 2d 1277, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 158, 2004 WL 212452

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 5, 2004·No. No. SC02-681·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Paul v. Paul, 807 So.2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), a decision which the district court of appeal certified to be in direct conflict with the decision of another district court pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we have now determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Paul v. Paul, 807 So.2d 191 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), a decision which the district court of appeal certified to be in direct conflict with the decision of another district court pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we have now determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. QUINCE, J., dissents.

Paul v. Paul, 865 So. 2d 1277, 29 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 64, 2004 Fla. LEXIS 158, 2004 WL 212452 (Fla. 2004).

Pincite

865 So. 2d 1277 (Paul v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related