Paul Koehler v. Ming Yang
This text of Paul Koehler v. Ming Yang (Paul Koehler v. Ming Yang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,__________________ October 17, 2013
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A14A0109. PAUL KOEHLER, et al. v. MING YANG.
Attorney Paul Koehler and Defendant Robert Klenberg filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order awarding OCGA § 9-15-14 attorney fees to Ming Yang in the parties’ divorce action. The Georgia Supreme Court has jurisdiction over all divorce and alimony cases. Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VI, § VI, ¶ III (6). Because the order that Koehler and Klenberg seek to appeal is ancillary to the divorce action, the Supreme Court has jurisdiction over this appeal. See Evers v. Evers, 277 Ga. 132 (587 SE2d 22) (2003). This appeal is therefore TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 10/17/2013 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paul Koehler v. Ming Yang, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-koehler-v-ming-yang-gactapp-2013.