Paul Ginsburg v. Horace Stern and Patrick N. Bolsinger

295 F.2d 698
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedNovember 29, 1961
Docket13598_1
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 295 F.2d 698 (Paul Ginsburg v. Horace Stern and Patrick N. Bolsinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul Ginsburg v. Horace Stern and Patrick N. Bolsinger, 295 F.2d 698 (3d Cir. 1961).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit in this appeal attacking the judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

The appellant’s brief will be stricken from the records of this Court because of the false and scandalous matter therein contained.

Moreover, the facts are such as to move us to award the successful party in this wholly frivolous appeal not only his usual costs of printing and the like but an additional sum of $500 on account of counsel fees and other expenses necessarily incurred by the appellees. The authority for this award is found in 28 U.S.C. § 1912, our own decision in In re Midland United Co., 3 Cir., 1944, 141 F.2d 692, and Griffin Wellpoint Corp. v. Munro-Langstroth, Inc., 1 Cir., 1959, 269 F.2d 64.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 F.2d 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-ginsburg-v-horace-stern-and-patrick-n-bolsinger-ca3-1961.