Bonn Kraus Ginsburg and John Paul Ginsburg, Minors, by Their Guardian Ad Litem, Betty K. Ginsburg v. Paul Ginsburg

Third Circuit

Bonn Kraus Ginsburg and John Paul Ginsburg, Minors, by Their Guardian Ad Litem, Betty K. Ginsburg v. Paul Ginsburg

330 F.2d 613, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5607

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 1964

Docket14675

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 330 F.2d 613 (Bonn Kraus Ginsburg and John Paul Ginsburg, Minors, by Their Guardian Ad Litem, Betty K. Ginsburg v. Paul Ginsburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bonn Kraus Ginsburg and John Paul Ginsburg, Minors, by Their Guardian Ad Litem, Betty K. Ginsburg v. Paul Ginsburg, 330 F.2d 613, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5607 (3d Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court below found that the appellant’s “Motion to Strike Judgment and Quash Execution Thereon” presented no new matter and “was merely a rehash and a resubmission of contentions incorporated previously in various motions”. The court then concluded “that what is now being done is purely a matter of delay” and denied the motion. This appeal followed.

Our independent examination of the long series of post judgment motions filed by the appellant in this case convinces us that the district court’s characterization and disposition of this motion were proper.

The district court’s order will be affirmed. The appellees’ costs and an attorney’s fee of $500. on this appeal shall be taxed against the appellant. See Ginsburg v. Stern, 295 F.2d 698 (C.A.3, 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987, 82 S.Ct. 603, 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The court below found that the appellant’s “Motion to Strike Judgment and Quash Execution Thereon” presented no new matter and “was merely a rehash and a resubmission of contentions incorporated previously in various motions”. The court then concluded “that what is now being done is purely a matter of delay” and denied the motion. This appeal followed.

Our independent examination of the long series of post judgment motions filed by the appellant in this case convinces us that the district court’s characterization and disposition of this motion were proper.

The district court’s order will be affirmed. The appellees’ costs and an attorney’s fee of $500. on this appeal shall be taxed against the appellant. See Ginsburg v. Stern, 295 F.2d 698 (C.A.3, 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987, 82 S.Ct. 603, 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

330 F.2d 613, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bonn-kraus-ginsburg-and-john-paul-ginsburg-minors-by-their-guardian-ad-ca3-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack