Paul G. SHULTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY, United States of America, Defendant-Appellee

96 F.3d 1222, 96 Daily Journal DAR 11561, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7050, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24725
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 20, 1996
Docket92-35197, 92-35580
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 96 F.3d 1222 (Paul G. SHULTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY, United States of America, Defendant-Appellee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paul G. SHULTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF ARMY, United States of America, Defendant-Appellee, 96 F.3d 1222, 96 Daily Journal DAR 11561, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7050, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24725 (9th Cir. 1996).

Opinions

Per Curiam Opinion; Dissent by Judge ALARCON.

ORDER

The opinion dated November 30, 1993 is withdrawn.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The government’s petition for rehearing is granted, the opinion of November 30,1993 at 10 F.3d 649 is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place.

Paul G. Shultz appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of the government in his quiet title action under 28 U.S.C. § 2409a. Shultz argued that he has a right-of-way across Fort Wainwright to get back and forth between Fairbanks and his property under either R.S. 2477, 43 U.S.C. § 932, or Alaska common law, or both. Because we ultimately agree with the district court that Shultz has not sustained his burden to factually establish a continuous R.S. 2477 route or a right-of-way under Alaska common law, we affirm the district court. We do not reach Shultz’s argument that the district court erred by holding that his action was time-barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2409a(g).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dickson v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources
433 P.3d 1075 (Alaska Supreme Court, 2018)
Carey Mills v. United States
742 F.3d 400 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Lyon v. Gila River Indian Community
626 F.3d 1059 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
So. Utah Wilderness v. BLM
Tenth Circuit, 2005
Alleman v. United States
372 F. Supp. 2d 1212 (D. Oregon, 2005)
Hoeferer v. Babbitt
139 F.3d 726 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Hoefler v. Babbitt
139 F.3d 726 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 F.3d 1222, 96 Daily Journal DAR 11561, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7050, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-g-shultz-plaintiff-appellant-v-department-of-army-united-states-ca9-1996.