Paul E. Sernau, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Paul E. Sernau, Inc. v. United States

53 Cust. Ct. 315, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3177

United States Customs Court·Decided November 19, 1964·No. No. 68895; protest 64/5357 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as “Long neck ducks” and identified as item 870/7 contained in cartons 9363/21-30, consists of natural, preserved, immature 'ducks, chiefly used as a decorative article and not as a toy, and that such ducks consist of feather and downs on the skin, dressed, colored, or otherwise advanced or manufactured, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as “Long neck ducks” and identified as item 870/7 contained in cartons 9363/21-30, consists of natural, preserved, immature 'ducks, chiefly used as a decorative article and not as a toy, and that such ducks consist of feather and downs on the skin, dressed, colored, or otherwise advanced or manufactured, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Paul E. Sernau, Inc. v. United States, 53 Cust. Ct. 315, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3177 (cusc 1964).

Pincite

53 Cust. Ct. 315 (Paul E. Sernau, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.