Paul E. Sernau, Inc. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 312, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 877
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paul E. Sernau, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 46 Cust. Ct. 514
United States Customs Court·Decided November 28, 1962·No. No. 67224; protest 61/24626 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the principles herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 CCPA 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the cases, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon the cases of merchandise, which were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul E. Sernau, Inc. v. United States, 49 Cust. Ct. 312, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 877 (cusc 1962).

49 Cust. Ct. 312 (Paul E. Sernau, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.