Paul C. Allen and Marjorie Allen v. Safeco Insurance Company of America

793 F.2d 1195, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33052
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 18, 1986·No. 84-3865·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court held that plaintiffs were entitled to prejudgment interest beginning 30 days after they submitted their proof of loss. In its brief on appeal Safeco contended that interest did not begin running until 30 days after entry of a final judgment. At oral argument Safeco conceded that plaintiffs were entitled to prejudgment interest and that the only difference between Safeco and plaintiffs on this. subject was whether interest began running 30 days after the proof of loss was filed or 60 days after proof of loss was filed, depending on which of two versions of Safeco’s policy was in effect.

Bearing in mind Safeco’s concession, and our inability to say that the court erred in choosing 30 days after proof of loss was filed as the trigger date, we grant plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing. We vacate our holding concerning prejudgment interest and affirm the judgment of the district' court with respect to prejudgment interest.

Petition for rehearing GRANTED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paul C. Allen and Marjorie Allen v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, 793 F.2d 1195, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 33052 (11th Cir. 1986).

793 F.2d 1195 (Paul C. Allen and Marjorie Allen v. Safeco Insurance Company of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MOORE v. WELLSTAR HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. Et Al.
824 S.E.2d 787 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2019)
Costantino v. Herzog
203 F.3d 164 (Second Circuit, 2000)
Costantino v. David M. Herzog, M.D., P.C.
203 F.3d 164 (Second Circuit, 2000)