Paul Benko v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
This text of 378 U.S. 126 (Paul Benko v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
84 S.Ct. 1658
12 L.Ed.2d 744
Paul BENKO
v.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO. et al.
No. 1345, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 15, 1964
Paul Benko, pro se.
Cornelius H. Doherty, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
378 U.S. 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paul-benko-v-hartford-accident-indemnity-co-scotus-1964.