Paul Benko v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
378 U.S. 126
Opinion
84 S.Ct. 1658
12 L.Ed.2d 744
Paul BENKO
v.
HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO. et al.
No. 1345, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 15, 1964
Paul Benko, pro se.
Cornelius H. Doherty, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paul Benko v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 378 U.S. 126 (1964).
378 U.S. 126 (Paul Benko v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Elfbrandt v. Russell
378 U.S. 127 (Supreme Court, 1964)
Benko v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
378 U.S. 126 (Supreme Court, 1964)