Elfbrandt v. Russell
This text of 378 U.S. 127 (Elfbrandt v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ELFBRANDT
v.
RUSSELL ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
W. Edward Morgan for petitioner.
Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, Philip M. Haggerty, Assistant Attorney General, and Norman E. Green for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Arizona for further consideration in light of Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U. S. 360.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
378 U.S. 127, 84 S. Ct. 1658, 12 L. Ed. 2d 744, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/elfbrandt-v-russell-scotus-1964.