Pauk v. Board of Higher Education
This text of 401 N.E.2d 214 (Pauk v. Board of Higher Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice Vincent A. Lupiano at the Appellate Division (62 AD2d 660), to which we add only that even if we accepted petitioner’s theory of estoppel the record does not establish that petitioner lacked the means of knowledge of what section 6206 (subd 3, par b) (now § 6212, subd 3, par b) of the Education Law provided.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
401 N.E.2d 214, 48 N.Y.2d 930, 425 N.Y.S.2d 92, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pauk-v-board-of-higher-education-ny-1979.