Pauk v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK

401 N.E.2d 214, 48 N.Y.2d 930
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 13, 1979·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

48 N.Y.2d 930 (1979)

Edgar Pauk, Appellant,
v.
Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued November 19, 1979.
Decided December 13, 1979.

Jonathan A. Weiss and Josephine Ho for appellant.

Allen G. Schwartz, Corporation Counsel (Ronald E. Sternberg and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice VINCENT A. LUPIANO at the Appellate Division (62 AD2d 660), to which we add only that even if we accepted petitioner's theory of estoppel the record does not establish that petitioner lacked the means of knowledge of what section 6206 (subd 3, par b) (now § 6212, subd 3, par b) of the Education Law provided.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pauk v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, 401 N.E.2d 214, 48 N.Y.2d 930 (N.Y. 1979).

401 N.E.2d 214 (Pauk v. BD. OF HIGHER EDUC. OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Acinapuro v. Board of Cooperative Educational Services
89 A.D.2d 329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Leibowitz v. State University
85 A.D.2d 293 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)