Pattison v. Spratlan

Texas Supreme Court

Pattison v. Spratlan

539 S.W.2d 60, 19 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 380, 1976 Tex. LEXIS 230

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 7, 1976

DocketB-6014

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 539 S.W.2d 60 (Pattison v. Spratlan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pattison v. Spratlan, 539 S.W.2d 60, 19 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 380, 1976 Tex. LEXIS 230 (Tex. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This was a suit filed by Kelly Spratlan, Supervisor of Welfare of Smith County against Pamela Jean Pattison to terminate the parent-child relationship between Patti-son and her three children. The trial court has terminated the parent-child relationship under Article 15.02(l)(k) and (2) of the Family Code. The Court of Civil Appeals has affirmed and assessed all costs against Pattison. 535 S.W.2d 48. An affidavit of inability to pay costs on appeal was filed by Pattison in the trial court. Since no contest was filed to this affidavit under Rule 355(e), Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the allegations in it are taken as true and the Court of Civil Appeals erred in assessing appeals costs against Pattison. Pursuant to Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the application for writ of error is granted and, without hearing argument, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is modified so as to strike out any assessment of appeals costs against Pattison. Otherwise, the judgment is affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This was a suit filed by Kelly Spratlan, Supervisor of Welfare of Smith County against Pamela Jean Pattison to terminate the parent-child relationship between Patti-son and her three children. The trial court has terminated the parent-child relationship under Article 15.02(l)(k) and (2) of the Family Code. The Court of Civil Appeals has affirmed and assessed all costs against Pattison. 535 S.W.2d 48. An affidavit of inability to pay costs on appeal was filed by Pattison in the trial court. Since no contest was filed to this affidavit under Rule 355(e), Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the allegations in it are taken as true and the Court of Civil Appeals erred in assessing appeals costs against Pattison. Pursuant to Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the application for writ of error is granted and, without hearing argument, the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is modified so as to strike out any assessment of appeals costs against Pattison. Otherwise, the judgment is affirmed as modified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 S.W.2d 60, 19 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 380, 1976 Tex. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pattison-v-spratlan-tex-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack