Pattinson v. Stephens
Opinion
ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
We dismiss this appeal taken by a former husband from a final order finding appellant’s former wife to not be in criminal contempt of court. As distinguished from civil contempt, which is court coercion applied for the benefit of a civil litigant, the only proper objective of criminal contempt is as punishment to vindicate the authority of a court. Even when an alleged criminal contempt arises out of a civil case it is not a part of the civil cause and a civil litigant has no standing to appeal the judge’s determination that, under the circumstances presented, the dignity and authority of the court does not require a finding of guilt of criminal contempt. While we find no authority on point, see generally South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, 88 So.2d 891 (Fla.1956).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
436 So. 2d 975 (Pattinson v. Stephens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.