Pattinson v. Stephens

436 So. 2d 975, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22769
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 28, 1983·No. No. 83-821·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

COWART, Judge.

We dismiss this appeal taken by a former husband from a final order finding appellant’s former wife to not be in criminal contempt of court. As distinguished from civil contempt, which is court coercion applied for the benefit of a civil litigant, the only proper objective of criminal contempt is as punishment to vindicate the authority of a court. Even when an alleged criminal contempt arises out of a civil case it is not a part of the civil cause and a civil litigant has no standing to appeal the judge’s determination that, under the circumstances presented, the dignity and authority of the court does not require a finding of guilt of criminal contempt. While we find no authority on point, see generally South Dade Farms, Inc. v. Peters, 88 So.2d 891 (Fla.1956).

DISMISSED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pattinson v. Stephens, 436 So. 2d 975, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 22769 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

436 So. 2d 975 (Pattinson v. Stephens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniel Kaplan v. Kenneth B. Schurr
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2025
Summer v. Summer
2012 UT App 159 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2012)