Patterson v. Warden FCI Williamsburg

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Patterson v. Warden FCI Williamsburg. Read the opinion of the Court — 412 F. App'x 646
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2011·No. 10-7753·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7753

JOHN C. PATTERSON,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WARDEN FCI WILLIAMSBURG,

Respondent – Appellee,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (6:10-cv-02408-RMG)

Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 23, 2011

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John C. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

John C. Patterson, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on Patterson’s 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Warden

FCI Williamsburg, No. 6:10-cv-02408-RMG (D.S.C. Nov. 29, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. Warden FCI Williamsburg, (4th Cir. 2011).

Patterson v. Warden FCI Williamsburg (Patterson v. Warden FCI Williamsburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241