Patterson v. Warden FCI Williamsburg

412 F. App'x 646
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2011·No. No. 10-7753·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John C. Patterson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Patterson’s 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Patterson v. Warden FCI Williamsburg, No. 6:10-cv-02408-RMG, 2010 WL 4922671 (D.S.C. Nov. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. Warden FCI Williamsburg, 412 F. App'x 646 (4th Cir. 2011).

412 F. App'x 646 (Patterson v. Warden FCI Williamsburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clemons v. United States
181 L. Ed. 2d 131 (Supreme Court, 2011)