Patterson v. State

88 So. 3d 331, 2012 WL 1520846, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6826
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 2, 2012·No. No. 3D12-726·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Kevin Patterson, appeals an order dated February 2, 2012, denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We treat the defendant’s notice of appeal as a petition for belated appeal and grant the petition. On the merits, we affirm. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Additionally, the order dated March 8, 2012, is affirmed, as the defendant’s motion was successive. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(f); Owen v. Crosby, 854 So.2d 182, 187 (Fla.2003).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. State, 88 So. 3d 331, 2012 WL 1520846, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6826 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

88 So. 3d 331 (Patterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owen v. Crosby
854 So. 2d 182 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Hernandez v. State
61 So. 3d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)