Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Patterson v. State

Patterson v. State

88 So. 3d 331, 2012 WL 1520846, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6826
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 2, 2012
DocketNo. 3D12-726
StatusPublished

This text of 88 So. 3d 331 (Patterson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patterson v. State, 88 So. 3d 331, 2012 WL 1520846, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6826 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Kevin Patterson, appeals an order dated February 2, 2012, denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We treat the defendant’s notice of appeal as a petition for belated appeal and grant the petition. On the merits, we affirm. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

Additionally, the order dated March 8, 2012, is affirmed, as the defendant’s motion was successive. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(f); Owen v. Crosby, 854 So.2d 182, 187 (Fla.2003).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Owen v. Crosby
854 So. 2d 182 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Hernandez v. State
61 So. 3d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 So. 3d 331, 2012 WL 1520846, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 6826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.