Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Patterson v. State

Patterson v. State

858 So. 2d 364, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16536, 2003 WL 22461513
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Patterson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 796 So. 2d 572 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2003·No. No. 1D03-3417·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order denying the appellant’s motion to enforce plea agreement is affirmed without prejudice to the appellant seeking administrative relief from the Department of Corrections. See Banks v. State, 793 So.2d 132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

AFFIRMED.

BROWNING, POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. State, 858 So. 2d 364, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 16536, 2003 WL 22461513 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

858 So. 2d 364 (Patterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banks v. State
793 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)