Patterson v. State

785 So. 2d 1246, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7502, 2001 WL 575220
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Patterson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 796 So. 2d 572
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 30, 2001·No. No. 4D98-4215·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On appeal, the state concedes that an evidentiary hearing is required to resolve the issues raised in Hoyt Patterson’s post-conviction motion. We agree. The order summarily denying Patterson’s motion is reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court with direction to hold an eviden-tiary hearing to resolve his claim.

WARNER, C.J., STONE and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. State, 785 So. 2d 1246, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7502, 2001 WL 575220 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

785 So. 2d 1246 (Patterson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.