Patterson v. Childs
This text of 72 S.E. 45 (Patterson v. Childs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “Payment of money due to the creditor or Ms authorized or general agent, or one whom the creditor accredits as agent though he may not be so, or to his partner interested with him in the money, shall be good; and if such agent receives property other than money as money, the creditor is bound thereby.” Civil Code (1910), § 4311; McLaugh[647]*647lin v. Blount, 61 Ga. 168; Holmes v. Langston, 110 Ga. 861 (6) (36 S. E. 251). The rule is different as to attorneys at law; they cannot, without special authority, receive anything in discharge of the client’s claim but the full amount in cash. Cjvil Code (1910), .§ 4956.
2. The judgment of the trial judge, who passed upon all questions, both of law and of fact, is not without evidence to'support it.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 S.E. 45, 9 Ga. App. 646, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-childs-gactapp-1911.