Bell & Harrell v. Kwilecki
74 S.E. 444, 11 Ga. App. 9, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 229
This text of 74 S.E. 444 (Bell & Harrell v. Kwilecki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bell & Harrell v. Kwilecki, 74 S.E. 444, 11 Ga. App. 9, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 229 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
Opinion
1. “Without special authority, attorneys can not receive anything in discharge of a client’s claim but the full amount in cash.” Civil Code (1910), § 4956; Patterson v. Childs, 9 Ga. App. 646 (72 S. E. 45).
2. The court did not err in sustaining the certiorari and entering final judgment in the plaintiff’s favor. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
John Bean Manufacturing Co. v. Citizens Bank
4 S.E.2d 924 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Johnson v. Starr Piano Co.
108 S.E. 811 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Jones v. Word & Mauldin
99 S.E. 230 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Lynchburg Shoe Co. v. Gladney
90 S.E. 1044 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
74 S.E. 444, 11 Ga. App. 9, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-harrell-v-kwilecki-gactapp-1912.