Bell & Harrell v. Kwilecki
74 S.E. 444, 11 Ga. App. 9, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 229
Opinion
1. “Without special authority, attorneys can not receive anything in discharge of a client’s claim but the full amount in cash.” Civil Code (1910), § 4956; Patterson v. Childs, 9 Ga. App. 646 (72 S. E. 45).
2. The court did not err in sustaining the certiorari and entering final judgment in the plaintiff’s favor. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell & Harrell v. Kwilecki, 74 S.E. 444, 11 Ga. App. 9, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 229 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
74 S.E. 444 (Bell & Harrell v. Kwilecki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
John Bean Manufacturing Co. v. Citizens Bank
4 S.E.2d 924 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Johnson v. Starr Piano Co.
108 S.E. 811 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Jones v. Word & Mauldin
99 S.E. 230 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Lynchburg Shoe Co. v. Gladney
90 S.E. 1044 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)