Patterson v. Bucknall S. S. Lines, Ltd.

203 F. 1021, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1786
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided April 1, 1913·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

If sued- in a state court by the citizen assignor of any of these causes of action, this alien defendant would have the right to remove the cause to a federal court. It cannot be deprived of that right because the assignee of such^ causes of action has joined it'with other nonremovable causes of action in a similar suit. The motion to remand is therefore denied. Plaintiff has no ground to complain that this disposition of the cause leaves the nonremovable causes of action here for trial. His own conduct in unnecessarily uniting them all in one suit has brought the situation about. •

Motion to remand is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. Bucknall S. S. Lines, Ltd., 203 F. 1021, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1786 (S.D.N.Y. 1913).

203 F. 1021 (Patterson v. Bucknall S. S. Lines, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ivy River Land & Timber Co. v. American Insurance
130 S.E. 864 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Bedell v. Baltimore & O. R.
245 F. 788 (N.D. Ohio, 1917)
Lusk v. Osborn
191 S.W. 944 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1917)
Jones v. Southern Ry. Co.
236 F. 584 (N.D. Georgia, 1916)
Flas v. Illinois Cent. R.
229 F. 319 (D. Nebraska, 1916)