Patterson v. Bucknall S. S. Lines, Ltd.

203 F. 1021, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1786
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedApril 1, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 203 F. 1021 (Patterson v. Bucknall S. S. Lines, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patterson v. Bucknall S. S. Lines, Ltd., 203 F. 1021, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1786 (S.D.N.Y. 1913).

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

If sued- in a state court by the citizen assignor of any of these causes of action, this alien defendant would have the right to remove the cause to a federal court. It cannot be deprived of that right because the assignee of such^ causes of action has joined it'with other nonremovable causes of action in a similar suit. The motion to remand is therefore denied. Plaintiff has no ground to complain that this disposition of the cause leaves the nonremovable causes of action here for trial. His own conduct in unnecessarily uniting them all in one suit has brought the situation about. •

Motion to remand is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ivy River Land & Timber Co. v. American Insurance
130 S.E. 864 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Bedell v. Baltimore & O. R.
245 F. 788 (N.D. Ohio, 1917)
Lusk v. Osborn
191 S.W. 944 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1917)
Jones v. Southern Ry. Co.
236 F. 584 (N.D. Georgia, 1916)
Flas v. Illinois Cent. R.
229 F. 319 (D. Nebraska, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 F. 1021, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-bucknall-s-s-lines-ltd-nysd-1913.