Patterson v. American Kennel Club

Fourth Circuit

Patterson v. American Kennel Club

54 F. App'x 175

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Patterson v. American Kennel Club. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 F. App'x 172 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 10, 2003·No. No. 02-2203·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Loria Ann Patterson appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendant’s motion for sanctions and dismiss her claims under the Equal Pay Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Patterson v. Am. Kennel Club, No. CA-01-20-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Loria Ann Patterson appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendant’s motion for sanctions and dismiss her claims under the Equal Pay Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Patterson v. Am. Kennel Club, No. CA-01-20-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Patterson v. American Kennel Club, 54 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

54 F. App'x 175 (Patterson v. American Kennel Club) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.