Patterson v. American Kennel Club

42 F. App'x 620
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Patterson v. American Kennel Club. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 F. App'x 172
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 5, 2002·No. Nos. 02-1502, 02-1503·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Loria Ann Patterson appeals the magistrate judge’s order approving a discovery plan relating to her claims under the Equal Pay Act (No. 02-1502). She also appeals the district court’s order setting a trial date (No. 02-1503). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the orders are not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders here appealed are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.

We dismiss the appeals as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patterson v. American Kennel Club, 42 F. App'x 620 (4th Cir. 2002).

42 F. App'x 620 (Patterson v. American Kennel Club) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)