Patrick v. United States

53 F.3d 344, 1994 WL 745640
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedJanuary 27, 1994
Docket94-1006
StatusPublished

This text of 53 F.3d 344 (Patrick v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patrick v. United States, 53 F.3d 344, 1994 WL 745640 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

Opinion

53 F.3d 344
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

C.H. PATRICK; Intertech; Sinochem International Chemicals
Co.; Sinochem Shandong Import & Export Corp.;
and Kwong Fat Hong Chemicals, Ltd.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Sandoz Chemicals Corporation, Defendant.

No. 94-1006.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 27, 1994.

ORDER

Upon further consideration, it is

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED; and the petition for review is hereby, DISMISSED, under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 F.3d 344, 1994 WL 745640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-v-united-states-cafc-1994.