Patrick v. United States
This text of 16 F.3d 421 (Patrick v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
16 F.3d 421
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
C.H. PATRICK; Intertech; Sinochem International Chemicals
Co.; Sinochem Shandong Import & Export Corp.;
and Kwong Fat Hong Chemicals, Ltd.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Sandoz Chemicals Corporation, Defendant.
No. 94-1006.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 16, 1993.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ORDER
The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is
ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 F.3d 421, 1993 WL 525889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-v-united-states-cafc-1993.