Patrick v. State

172 So. 474, 126 Fla. 703, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1674
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 9, 1936·Published

Opinions

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice TERRELL and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the opinion that the judgenmt of the Circuit Court should be affirmed, while Mr. Presiding Justice ELLIS, Mr. Justice BUFORD and Mr. Justice DAVIS are of the opinion that the said judgment should be reversed for a new trial. When the members of the Supreme Court sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that *Page 704 the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State, ex rel. Hampton, v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. Rep. 51, that the judgment of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, C.J., and ELLIS, TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD and DAVIS, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patrick v. State, 172 So. 474, 126 Fla. 703, 1936 Fla. LEXIS 1674 (Fla. 1936).

172 So. 474 (Patrick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patrick v. State
158 So. 101 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
McBrayer v. State
150 So. 736 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Prior v. Oglesby
50 Fla. 248 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1905)
Griffith v. Alcocke
37 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)