Patrick v. State

158 So. 101, 117 Fla. 432, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1287
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 25, 1934·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Upon an indictment charging murder in the first degree by shooting with a pistol, a verdict of guilty *433 of manslaughter was returned, upon which the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for ten years in the State penitentiary.

• The corpus delicti was clearly proven, and there is ample evidence legally sufficient to sustain the verdict beyond a reasonable doubt, that the deceased was killed by a pistol shot discharged by the defendant.

• No material error was committed in the admission of evidence over appropriate objection, as to the financial circumstances of the defendant just prior to the homicide and the possession by him of money just after the event. Without reference to such evidence and other testimony admitted over objection, there is ample evidence to sustain the conviction.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, Ellis, and Brown, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J.,- and Buford, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patrick v. State, 158 So. 101, 117 Fla. 432, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1287 (Fla. 1934).

158 So. 101 (Patrick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ragan v. State
599 So. 2d 276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
State v. Campbell
757 P.2d 230 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1988)
Beard v. State
180 So. 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1938)
Patrick v. State
172 So. 474 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)