Patrick v. Gatien

103 So. 3d 132, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 663, 2012 WL 5357279, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2248
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 1, 2012·No. No. SC11-1466·Published

Opinion

PER CURLAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Patrick v. Gatien, 65 So.3d 42 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011), based on express and direct conflict with the decisions of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Novitsky v. Hards, 589 So.2d 404 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), and of this Court in Hillsborough County Hospital Authority v. Coffaro, 829 So.2d 862 (Fla.2002). See art. V, § 3(b)(8), Fla. Const.; Patrick v. Gatien, 79 So.3d 745 (Fla.2012) (table). Upon further consideration of the issues involved, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patrick v. Gatien, 103 So. 3d 132, 37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 663, 2012 WL 5357279, 2012 Fla. LEXIS 2248 (Fla. 2012).

103 So. 3d 132 (Patrick v. Gatien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Novitsky v. Hards
589 So. 2d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Hillsborough County Hosp. Auth. v. Coffaro
829 So. 2d 862 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Patrick v. Gatien
65 So. 3d 42 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)