Patrick James Campbell v. Roger W. Crist, Warden of Montana State Prison and Mike Greely, Montana State Attorney General

647 F.2d 956, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12544
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 8, 1981
Docket80-3285
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 647 F.2d 956 (Patrick James Campbell v. Roger W. Crist, Warden of Montana State Prison and Mike Greely, Montana State Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patrick James Campbell v. Roger W. Crist, Warden of Montana State Prison and Mike Greely, Montana State Attorney General, 647 F.2d 956, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12544 (9th Cir. 1981).

Opinion

SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:

Campbell appeals the denial of a writ of habeas corpus. Campbell v. Crist, 491 F.Supp. 586 (D.Mont.1980). He contends that the state court lacked jurisdiction to try him for a robbery committed on the Flathead Indian Reservation. He raises numerous other objections regarding the adequacy of the state proceedings, and of his representation by counsel. We affirm.

Normally, a federal court will not entertain a state prisoner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus unless the petitioner has *957 exhausted available state judicial remedies. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b); Sweet v. Cupp, 640 F.2d 233 at 236 (9th Cir. 1981). If the petitioner’s claim was not presented to the state courts on direct appeal, state collateral remedies must be exhausted. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(c); Sweet v. Cupp, supra.

This court may consider whether state remedies have been exhausted even if the state does not raise the issue. Rose v. Dickson, 327 F.2d 27, 28 (9th Cir. 1964). See also Sweet v. Cupp, supra at 237 & n.5.

There is no indication in the record that Campbell has exhausted available state judicial remedies. In the interest of comity we will not consider the merits of Campbell’s petition.

The judgment appealed from is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Manuel v. Speer
W.D. Washington, 2025
Warner v. Bennett
W.D. Washington, 2024
Wright v. Pierce County Jail
W.D. Washington, 2022
Adams v. Jackson
W.D. Washington, 2022
(HC) Lund v. Locatelli
E.D. California, 2022
Hyde v. Houser
D. Alaska, 2021
Nicoli v. Houser
D. Alaska, 2021
Chunak v. Houser
D. Alaska, 2021
Rosales v. State of Washington
W.D. Washington, 2021
Kone v. Hernandez
D. Alaska, 2021
Thomas v. State of Washington
W.D. Washington, 2020
Fowler v. Uttecht
W.D. Washington, 2020
Menzies v. State of Washington
W.D. Washington, 2020
Shaffer v. Uttecht
W.D. Washington, 2020
Maynard v. State of Washington
W.D. Washington, 2020
Haxton v. Uttecht
W.D. Washington, 2020
Murphy v. Uttecht
W.D. Washington, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
647 F.2d 956, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-james-campbell-v-roger-w-crist-warden-of-montana-state-prison-ca9-1981.