Patrick Heaney v. State

Opinion

f^kl_ LOQVX Lh$£. 00. * \>tb^- MZO£ZO&

^ECEIVED^ October 4, 2016 OCTO4Z016 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS,

^OTlo^ TO Co^eL.

£©tf\£S fceOj "?A-TeicJC &Eft>JeVf ^5>elU-)-V CU,^ a*s^J-(oUy A-sU -U- Cou/-V to

s

*jst~Uk* lwV\.A^ w-a-^1 WW.VUO 4rrc;V

„oAoL* 1^.1 W**-S -tUi ^ *CUOS-ei ^^1- K uW*>A f*^_,fc,

JU, -\^ j^w c^l^r o^ ^v^^*- tV^"^^ ft^' ^f^ r^sV" ^A \l

^ WlUU j^lp rtP 0>PaP>u ^i Mol\f?> POP- pg^ \^^ to»c>^inp-

Dt tU- HoV'V^tJt Uur-t v^Uit iuVy U ^^of^v W^lU^ tUift/1

^ te>oA ot ftwJs t tV.vl b^Wut ^ T0l«>. ^V:^ sUv TU. ^-^ 1L-

Nrf o-r T^X^S (wl "W>/ sLe>C> fywA 1L*. SWb- «Lx L K>o\ U\oZ> St-itoLAtb.

^tJOeilAoV {U*9UA*^ "tLa***- ilfcov«fi^^ ^o lee- iv»»»L_ D>aA o\ A^kAVft.'tjL. <£*~^£>r»L, 3ST. (\Y\>«^WwO^ Wrt> V^-QO-eVTeA Lfi>t*f^ AteteHucU.!. Coo^»t«JL ^O(i»0t~ X=> ftA'tA-

C^xx-^ Ao uAtefw_ ¥>>^<\V*vj"V &\ £

,i.V»c.v>

J^=. Co«a>JL "VU. ^«*A o&v«As. 0\ tU Trvvo\s.tr>op W, HoV VvWu> LouA- jLAo JvW IA4 I.UU f^*Xw^ lArfro^fr^

t»B oasafcg> ^sxjLuft&vup^

GvC^-uV-i ©^ ^ ^ A«w o^ Sfc^Je^W^ V>> -\L4_V<2eMf 2-CHCp <

Ov^V^ ^ft*^»W^A

Jr* \-2SK-[u

feE . '•. -OVACo-.oO Clo -CtL

W> ta^ CJiuV N

W*> We6^ --**DtiwU^ ^ T^ V^l^" f «*>^lu^lAc-4. io M 4 .few. A.

#&*&>---T&---*&&ZM %>&&><*

^RECEIVED\ OCT 04 2016

V THRDCOURJ OFAPPEALS, JEFFREYaKYLE / &\\v\&& A^, ^*v woo tw •si a)

w i

in ^ -si

-.1 r o

* v •> ? ^ v S* f- -3

-£ —J

H E ^ R!T'