Patrick Heaney v. State

Opinion

K^0\L tf>. QZ~\£-00*410'C$s

September 2, 2015

ky>e\\ee,

ozrk JAxuatI ^^:Jr U>A T VAp-Tlo^ "Cod gYTOOSio^ OT Tt^g" dggtaSTk To

-CAw^* Wvs ftVoTfo^ Tbg ggAflftttUPfc- Uv feo) sW+y i*fi. ;»

o-V <(>$e«A. Xri <»o^^or-lr; ft^fclUvf uaooiL^L^ -fU_ Xi

be S,^-VcvwtW fc1^, Xov£", u:

U-M EL

Vse^.<£.&Y ftX-tfUwAvl.^ tt\%J\&, tax*.-Aw \j»vL*

IS. *" A ' l " ' x " tl ' —' - * "

\o (V?*aAU Tfc\*l Couj-V £«Ao<»<- yOo. k/OC- ii''Zo?-2.C><±>

ftp f,Al*wV U**. £e_<£u&r-Wi -tUwV ^L*- £i<-r\r- ^cUi_ *i*U~\$.

z^f ^X, "^\«0U \Lw^f XbC'S" ^ ^GTS^ k«'->5 t>rcSe^4Lr

3»H LAv\e- &Z 4o be- W*-l t^ell^Vs. TigsT MpTio>) Toft 6Y-T£a)S>1o^ or Tii^g iOee^>es> Tc? R-egPoOfr To

Ool^c_ ^

H*n /^V 51^Zoi< >+

Qfi—OZ-tS-'OotiDr C1L

r *mT 5 Mo -&-• feT .ME&bdEb—TD £&>Pnjoh So (fob kmejJT__u) &$>o\)& Q4v5>£ /l£/she&eb ojJ_

X, d So uetiv \ntpr tA^-q 6^

\ ^ s u>owv^ CXiA^cA iMWa*^ /RECEIVED n, : U* - l - \ SEP 0 2 2015 THIRDCOURT RD COURT OFAPPJATb/ OF APPB %

3^ £>$ F ^

^ s r 5

CD &/ ^ T^ W in

•si

}»in 1.0

Si 2"

in £i 0 ? ^ i -j A

|sss fo4 $5